Companies' implements related diversification strategies in
order to achieve and exploit economies of scope and build a competitive
advantage by building on existing resources, capabilities, and core
competencies. For companies that operate in multiple industries or product
markets, economies of scope represent cost savings attributed to entering an
additional business using capabilities and core competencies developed in
another business that can be transferred to a new business without significant
additional costs. In other words, companies that successfully transfer core
competencies from one business to another without incurring significant
additional costs will realize economies of scope.
The two primary operations-related economies through which
companies can create value (from economies of scope) are by sharing activities
or sharing core competencies. The difference between activity sharing and core
competence sharing is based on how different resources are used jointly to
create economies of scope. Tangible or physical resources, such as facilities
and equipment, may be shared to achieve economies of scope. Intangible
resources, such as manufacturing know-how, can be shared to achieve scope
economies. A key to creating value through sharing that are essentially separate
activities is to share know-how or skills rather than physical or tangible
resources.
Combinations of economies
|
Resulting Strategy
|
Economies for advantage
|
High operational/ low corporate
|
Vertical integration
|
Market power
|
Low operational/ low corporate
|
Unrelated diversification
|
Financial economies
|
high operational/ high corporate
|
Both operational and relatedness
|
Rare capability and can create diseconomies of scope
|
High operational/ high corporate
|
Related-linked diversification
|
Economies of scope
|
Table 5.6 Value-creating Strategies of Diversification
Companies seek to create value from economies of scope
through two basic kinds of operational economies: sharing activities and
transferring skills (corporate core competencies). However, the levels of the two of these will lead to
different corporate strategies with different advantages associated with each.